Showing posts sorted by relevance for query hoffa. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query hoffa. Sort by date Show all posts

Monday, September 05, 2011

Jimmy Hoffa! Finally a leftist who understands the true meaning of his ideas!

Finally a leftist has come along who understands the true meaning of his ideas, and doesn't try to hide it behind politically correct wobbly words! Let's hear it for Teamster President, Jimmy Hoffa! Finally! A leftist who understands the true meaning of his ideas!

While warming up the crowd for President Obama, Teamsters President Jimmy Hoffa demonstrated that he knows EXACTLY what ‘Spread the wealth around’ and the elimination of property rights means, and that is that the elimination of Rights requires the exercise of force to get your way:

"We've got to keep an eye on the battle that we face -- a war on workers. And you see it everywhere. It is the Tea Party," he said. "And there's only one way to beat and win that war -- the one thing about working people is, we like a good fight."

Interesting that the only thing the Tea Party advocates is the preservation of Individual Rights through the rule of law, as defined in the Constitution of the United States of America. Extremists.
How is that a threat? How is that in anyway seen as 'waging war' on workers? The people of the Tea Party are themselves made up on workers - where is the sense here? See the official St. Louis Tea Party response here.

Well, pardon me, I realize that if you've followed the last several posts on this site, we've already established the fact that most leftists use words as decoration and for visual impact - not because they mean something.

So... on that score, that of using words in a way that makes sense, well, Hoffa flunks out just as badly as all the rest of his fellow proregressive leftists do. But on the count of coming out and saying plainly and clearly, what his ideas must mean in practice, comes out and states the only alternative available to those who discard care for the meaning of words, on that score, I've just got to give him a big thumbs up!
“...The war on workers, and you see it everywhere, it [sic] is the Tea Party . . .President Obama, this is your army. We are ready to march. Let’s take these son of a bitches [sic] out . . .”
And President Obama is standing right there with him. Isn't that comforting?

So America, you've got a choice before you. Do you want to line up as an army and march on, and 'take out' your fellow Americans who are asking for the rule of law?

Or do you instead want to see that the Constitution is respected and that the rule of law rules the land - and not an army of thugs who want things there way, no matter the cost?

Choose wisely my friends.

UPDATE:
I didn't get to hear Biden's remarks from his rally until this morning, and if anything, I think they are far worse than what Obama and Hoffa had to say.

The Vice President of the United States, Joe Biden (now granted, it is Joe 'gaffamatic' Biden, but what he said fit seamlessly with what the others said), told his crowd
“this is a different kind of fight. This is a fight for the heart and soul of the labor movement. This is a fight for the existence of organized labor. You are the only ones who can stop the barbarians at the gate! That’s why they want you so bad.”
And worse,this:
“You are the only non-governmental power that has the power and capacity to stop this onslaught.”
Just think about the implications of that statement. One, that govt power is united with the interests of the labor movement and is also available to be used to 'stop this onslaught', and two, that union people comprise a power that should be used as a force, backed by the U.S. Govt, to be mobilized against those who disagree with them.

That those whose ideas don't agree with those of the labor movenemt, constitute an onslaught against the interests of the Govt.

Just friggin' Wow.

And neither Obama, Biden nor Hoffa are trying to walk their statements back in the least. Bad stuff is coming down the pike folks. If this stuff isn't called out, bad stuff can't help but follow.

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Instant Karma: According to Union leaders and membership, all union leaders and members are racists and fascists.

Just a quick note to prove I'm still alive and share a fun fact. It seems that the Unions are waking up to the facts about Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reed & Obamacare. The Wall Street Journal informs us that James P. Hoffa, together with other Union big-wigs, have penned a letter to little miss "Gotta pass it to find out what's in it" Pelosi and Harry 'Pasty Face' Reed (long time Nevadan's will get that), telling them that:
" will shatter not only our hard-earned health benefits, but destroy the foundation of the 40 hour work week that is the backbone of the American middle class."
They also note that their political darlings are apparently dishonestly leading them on for their own purposes:
" As you both know first-hand, our persuasive arguments have been disregarded and met with a stone wall by the White House and the pertinent agencies. "
They've even figured out that they won't get to keep their own health care plans if they like them,
"Our health plans have been built over decades by working men and women. Under the ACA as interpreted by the Administration, our employees will treated differently and not be eligible for subsidies afforded other citizens. As such, many employees will be relegated to second-class status and shut out of the help the law offers to for-profit insurance plans."
, with even a glimmering of a hint that the Free Market may have some benefits for workers, they note that,
"And finally, even though non-profit plans like ours won’t receive the same subsidies as for-profit plans, they’ll be taxed to pay for those subsidies. Taken together, these restrictions will make non-profit plans like ours unsustainable, and will undermine the health-care market of viable alternatives to the big health insurance companies."
Though, in the end, demonstrating that they are themselves simply corrupt thugs demanding their share of the loot, they opine,
"We continue to stand behind real health care reform, but the law as it stands will hurt millions of Americans including the members of our respective unions."
Isn't that special?

Of course, most of that is what the Tea Party was trying to explain to them back in 2010.

To which we were subjected to slander and even assault. But, out of respect for the Union brotherhood's tightly reasoned and highly principled responses to the Tea Party when we tried explain the '2+2=4's of the world to them, obviously Hoffa and all Union members, and all Union sympathizers, are clearly all ignorant racists and neo-fascists who just hate America and who especially hate America's working class, it's children and the elderly.

Thank you, that is all.

Monday, September 02, 2013

Labor Day Celebration:"We're all communists now... right? No? Then we're taking our racist fascist butts outta here!!!"

A couple weeks ago I noted that union bigwigs James P. Hoffa, & others, were so upset and disillusioned with Obamacare, that they wrote a letter to Harry Reid & Nancy Pelosi telling them just how unhappy they were with them, and with the Obama administration in general.

I also couldn't help but noticing that what they were saying about Obamacare - that it would ruin their healthcare, that it would cause unemployment, shatter the middle class, etc, were the very things which they had accused the Tea Party of being racists and fascists for having said... and so... by dint of their own reasoning, the Teamsters were obviously racists and fascists for not accepting what this President had created for them.

It was a pleasant morsel to savor... though...really... it was less like a morsel, than a mint.

Why?

Because what they were upset about, was not that Obamacare was going to do those very things to the country, but that Obama & his minions in the Senate and House weren't going to extend the unions enough exemptions to spare them what they were more than willing to inflict upon the rest of the country.

Hardly a Road to Damascus moment.

Well, we just got another little mint today, in that the Longshoreman's union is taking its 40,000 members and leaving the AFL-CIO, not just because of a turf war at the docks, but also in part, for its support for Obamacare as well as the administration's immigration policies.

But not because, you know, those policies are like, wrong, destructive, a violation or our rights, or anti-American, or anything like that... nyahhh. What of it? No, they're just peeved because the Trojan Horse that Obamacare is for single-payer govt controlled healthcare - aka Communism - hasn't rolled through the gates fast enough:
"The ILWU President made it clear they are for a single-payer, nationalized health care policy and are upset with the AFL-CIO for going along with Obama on the confiscatory tax on their "Cadillac" healthcare plan."
Not only that, but because neither the AFL-CIO nor the Obama Administration, would support an immigration plan that the NYT noted, insisted,
"Applicants must be at least 18 years old, have no "disqualifying felonies" on their records, be physically and mentally able to perform longshore work with or without reasonable accommodations for disabilities. Successful candidates, the committee said, must have sufficient understanding of English to understand safety warnings and be eligible to work in the United States."
IOW, the Longshoremen are demanding an immigration plan that, if the Tea Party or anyone else right of center had proposed it, would be called racist and fascist for.

And for not immediately being given a government run single payer healthcare plan that no communist worth his gulag would care to live without.

And while it's fun to be able to point out again that, by there own reasoning, they should be called racist fascists for their statements, the fact is that they only believe the administration hasn't been racist and fascist enough for their tastes.
"WAAAA!!!! We're not racist and communist enough yet! WAAAAAAA!!! We Wants IT!!!"
How's that for a truth in advertising Labor Day celebration?

Thursday, September 08, 2011

Rah! Rah! Ssss... Boommm... Bahhh! - Obama's Sound, and the Unions Fury

Fine sounding words and ominous sounding actions.
A couple take away points from President Obama's campaign speech tonight, both on the lightweight side, and an ominously heavy side. First the lightweight stuff.

From the opening of his speech, with its relentlessly peppy opening gambit of "Look at the wonders I have for you!", this speech was heavy on swell sounding words, but extremely light on acknowledging the costs which those words and wonders would bring. And in case you missed it, or didn't realize what it was you were hearing, this,
"The American Jobs Act will repair and modernize at least 35,000 schools. It will put people to work right now fixing roofs and windows; installing science labs and high-speed Internet in classrooms all across this country. It will rehabilitate homes and businesses in communities hit hardest by foreclosures. It will jumpstart thousands of transportation projects across the country. "
, is nothing but spending, and big spending at that. But the icing on the cake in our face, was this,

"Every child deserves a great school — and we can give it to them, if we act now."
With all the energy and practiced enthusiasm which this was delivered with, I found myself wondering, is the pitchman Billy Mays still alive? I could almost hear "But wait! There's more!"

This speech was no serious, considered, substantive plan to get government out of the way to enable America to get back to work, this was an infomercial to kick off his 2012 campaign - and worse than that, it was only the first part of one. We were told part way through, that we tuned in tonight in order to find out that we've got to endure a second speech in a couple weeks to learn what the plan is for how he's going to pay for all of this... which by the way, would be The Plan, which we were promised we'd hear tonight, and which was the point of calling a joint session of congress to witness.

No gots. Big surprise.

And then, not surprisingly, we discovered that the plan, which we still do not have, is one that is very much in keeping with yesterday's post on Robert B. Reich's article about Obama's 'Zero Economy',


This message of peace is from a Union site.
When words and actions don't agree...
read their actions.
 " It will provide a jolt to an economy that has stalled"
The viewpoint of this speech, and the person and team behind it, is not one that views an economy which is something that is made up of people making careful decisions, based upon perceived favorable, or hostile circumstances and laws, but one more consistent with seeing an economy as a closed system of rats in a maze, which uses shocks and cheese, in order to push them through, to ring the bell, and please their masters.

And it showed an obliviousness of our current situation, and how we got there, that is truly disturbing. Disturbing because of 'optimistic' sounding lines like this,

'And to help responsible homeowners, we're going to work with federal housing agencies, to help more poeple to refinance their mortgages, at rates that are no near 4%, that's a step "
, which were delivered with no awareness of how much they reflect the ideas which got us into the current situation we are trying so desperately to get out of today. Noting that the Republicans were still sitting down on what he expected to be an applause line for everyone, he says,
"I know you guys must be for this, because that's a step that can put more than $2,000 in family's pocket"
No, they are not for this - or at least they'd better not be. Does this President not have a clue what the major trigger was for the current mess we are in? Housing bubble? Helloo?!

If the people he is targeting here were good credit risks, they wouldn't need help from federal housing agencies to get low interest loans - I hear ads for several lenders touting just that every morning while driving into work. If they are credit risks, why in God's name, would you try, in this economy, triggered by federal agencies serving up home loans to people who didn't warrant good loans, why would you attempt yet another program for federal agencies to serve up more easy home loans to people who don't warrant a loan?

The one line in the entire speech which actually did catch my attention in a positive way, was this one,

"We're also planning to cut away the red tape that prevents too many rapidly-growing startup companies from raising capital and going public. "
, but unfortunately it was also the one line in the entire speech which began with 'We're also planning', rather than 'we are!' or 'we will!', and so, pardon my cynicism, but I put about as much faith in that materializing as I would a faith healer... who asks to be paid first.

But his most telling line, to my mind, was this - in what was said, and the much more meaningful portion that was not said, but was very much implied by it:

"What kind of country would this be if this Chamber had voted down Social Security or Medicare just because it violated some rigid idea about what government could or could not do?"
The easy reply to this is that this nation would be a far more closely knit one, a far wealthier one, one that would be significantly more free, and one with a much sounder rule of law, without those two Article 1, Section 8 shredding programs. Why do you ask?

Why did he ask? In hopes of successfully distracting from and ignoring several issues.

  • One, that few things are more divisive to society than govt charity; I do not see Social Security or Medicare as kindnesses, but as one of the first measures to begin breaking apart the bonds and responsibilities which had bound us together for so long.
  • Two, to point out how annoying, and obstructionist it is having to follow the rule of law is, and how the Constitution should be ignored, so that the President can more easily deliver goodies to his fans.
  • Three, he wants very much for the Constitution to be sidelined and ignored, in order to be able to 'do good' for the American people.
Speaking of goodies,

"The people who hired us to work for them, they don't have the luxury of waiting 14 months"
They also don't have the luxury of taking vacations every other week, unlike some POTUS's we know.

And now to the dark and heavy side.
The dark side of the evening grows out of my habit of paying more attention to what this President does, than to what he says he'd like to do. President Obama had a nice rousing line in his speech about the wonderfulness of three words:

"I want to see more products sold around the world stamped with three proud words: "Made in America.""
, which would be nice to hear, if it wasn't for the fact that sitting in the audience as a guest of Rep. Marsha Blackburn, was the CEO of Gibson guitar, whose company has been singled out by this President's Justice Dept. for harassment , has had plants closed down, and numerous materials confiscated with no explanation or charges being brought against them, other than suggestions that it shut down or send its manufacturing jobs to Madagascar.

That's a big Strike One!

Then there was the fact that sitting with the First Lady, was Jeffrey Immelt, the head of the 'JOBS!' committee, who's company, with his enthusiastic blessing, has sent several of its manufacturing divisions... to China!

That's a big Strike Two!

And if that wasn't bad enough, also sitting with the First Lady, was the President of the AFL-CIO union, Richard Trumpka.

That's a big Strike Three!, he's outta there, no credibility, no way, no how.

Why? You really need more? Ok.

On Labor Day the Teamster's President Jimmy Hoffa said,

“...The war on workers, and you see it everywhere, it [sic] is the Tea Party . . .President Obama, this is your army. We are ready to march. Let’s take these son of a bitches out . . .”
On Labor Day, VP Biden told a union crowd:
"You are the only ones who can stop the barbarians at the gate! That’s why they want you so bad.”
and worse, Biden said this:
“You are the only non-governmental power that has the power and capacity to stop this onslaught.”
And today, early this morning, hundreds - HUNDREDS - of members of the AFL-CIO stormed a port in Longview Washington, vandalized the grounds, and held people hostage, over a labor dispute...

"Hundreds of Longshoremen stormed the Port of Longview early Thursday, overpowered and held security guards, damaged railroad cars, and dumped grain that is the center of a labor dispute, said Longview Police Chief Jim Duscha.
Six guards were held hostage for a couple of hours after 500 or more Longshoremen broke down gates about 4:30 a.m. and smashed windows in the guard shack, he said."
... and that union's president, Richard Trumpka, was a guest of honor in President Obama's box tonight, to listen to the President's speech with the First Lady.

Anyone see any signs for concern here? Does anyone think that hundreds of members of a union are mobilized to storm a port, vandalize property, hold people hostage, and be released without charges - without the leadership of that union knowing about it? Ahead of time? Do you think the President of that union, knowing that he'll be sitting as a guest of the President of the United States of America, would risk blindsiding and embarrassing the President, without letting him know that... some sort of incident was going to occur?

Not friggin' likely. Anyone see any signs for concern here now?
"... nobody has been arrested. Most of the protesters returned to their union hall after cutting brake lines and spilling grain from car at the EGT terminal, Duscha said."
How about now? No? Really?

"We're not surprised," Duscha said. "A lot of the protesters were telling us this in only the start."
Now? If not now, when?! If not you, who?! Who are you waiting for? YOU are the person you have been waiting for... if you will do nothing, no one will.

As I said to a friend the other day, just think about the implications of that Vice President Obama's statement, and this mornings actions:


  1. That govt power is united with the interests of the labor movement and is also available to be used to 'stop this onslaught',
  2. That union people comprise a power that should be used as a force, backed by the U.S. Govt, to be mobilized against those who disagree with them.
  3. They apparently are beginning to do just that.
But we don't need to imagine the implications of this scenario any longer, it's beginning to happen right now. Just look at the news. If you can find it. Google it. You won't find much.

Interesting, no? Sound and fury, signifying... more than I'd like to imagine.