 |
| Not 'protesting': Stochastic terrorism |
These people who've been acting violently in the streets (again), are not protesters, and you should not tolerate the misidentification of their threats to your life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.
These people that are stopping people's cars in the streets, these people who are rioting outside federal facilities, these people that are harassing and interfering with law enforcement officers, rousting people out of diners, accosting random passersby while demanding that they identify themselves and denounce our laws, these people that invade and disrupt church services - these people are not protesters, and they are not in any reasonable way, committing their violent actions in support of any civil liberties, whatsoever.
 |
| CRT ...Maoism by any other name |
Why does it matter whether we call them 'protestors' or 'insurrectionists'? Because the pen is mightier than the sword!
If you persist in using their language of deception - a deception that goes back at least as far as the 'Berkeley *free speech* movement' (which was itself nothing more than organized political violence against the public peace) - that misidentifies who and what these folks are, then any reaction you have to their actions (actions which are plotted by them to instigate an overreaction from you), will be easily spun by them and their co-conspirators in the popular media, academia, and bureaucracies, to portray you as being in the wrong and as some form of anti-American fascist that is opposed to free speech and civil liberties.
 |
| Willful insanity |
Our society is held together by language, do you really think that misusing and misunderstanding the language we use can be tolerated and engaged in without consequences?
Do you not understand that the laws that uphold and protect our individual rights, lives, and property, are made from those same words that we've got in the habit of not paying attention to? The Rule of Law cannot be any sounder or stronger than our understanding and commitment to the words they are made from!
The pen is mightier than the sword and mishandling it can lead to serious injury to you and those around you.
They are following the insurrectionist tactics that have been taught by Marxist revolutionaries, from Alinsky. to Prairie Fire, and Beautiful Trouble - each of which expresses a violent opposition to the principles of the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and the Rule of Law - which is what makes them Pro-Regressive (they seek to regress our society to the time before those principles were understood and upheld), and a danger to every aspect of our lives.
Stop calling them protestors. Just stop it.
|
|
|
8 comments:
Hi, Van!
It's been a while! I just thought it was interesting that you spent a lot of time 5 years ago calling the January 6 insurrection a "protest" and defending the "riot" as much better than those nasty BLM riots. https://blogodidact.blogspot.com/2021/01/two-realities-in-jan-6th-protest-2nd.html
Interesting, too, that you have no "insurrection" or "Anti-American ideals" tags under that post, but this post DOES carry such tags. That post carries a "protest" tag.
I ALSO find your linked proof of anti-ICE insurrectionist activity awfully interesting. I'm not sure if you actually read it before making up your mind, but which of these recommendations for encountering ICE officers would you call insurrectionist?
"1. Request a plate check in the live call-dispatch or plate checker will confirm
2. Commute behind at a safe distance do not try to interfere or block them
3. Give updates on location as you change course
4. Give as much info when stopped or ICE agents leave the vehicle - dispatch will create a SALUTE alert with this information.
5. When they are out of their vehicles, honk, whistle, alert bystanders with "LA MIGRA
6. Passenger should be filming and dictating in the video exactly what is happening
7. IF YOU ARE CONFRONTED BY ICE: Do NOT open your doors or windows, calmly state: "I am observing and recording. I am not interfering."
8. "IF THREATENED WITH ARREST ASK
9. Ask if you are being detained.
1. If not detained, you may leave.
2. Do not argue - document
3. After a confrontation Take a break.
4. Update your dispatch team to let them know you are safe.
5. Get food, water, bathroom
6. Ask dispatch to send the link for the nightly after care call to decompress.
You are no classical liberal, as you have no space for people who disagree with you to determine their own way in life. Glad to see you're still as backwards as ever.
shallow astro said: "...you have no "insurrection" or "Anti-American ideals" tags under that post..." Correct, which would be less of a mystery to you, had you actually read that post. Something you could still try to do. It's unlikely you'd succeed, but... worth a shot.
"...do not try to interfere or block them..." Note: Driving your car into an ICE officer, attacking their vehicles, interferring in an arrest, are both failures to follow that 'advice', failures that can easily result in death. Go figure.
"...You are no classical liberal..." Wow! I'm sure it was accidental, but you actually managed to get something right there, I don't 'identify' as a Classical Liberal, for reasons that I exhaustively went into in this series of posts "Exiting the Wizard's Circle of Economics", particularly at this point The wishful thinking of the 'Classical Liberal' label.
Say shallowastro, are you still just a helper at your State Insurrection Instruction Center? Gosh I hope so, it'd be a shame if students there had to treat you as an actual professor. Not that you'd stand out from the crowd at all, but... still.
Cheers.
Yes, I know you put no such tags on the post I read. That's my point. You called it a protest. You are willing to forgive the same acts you denounce as long as they fit ideologically. Which is probably why you only attacked the newsworthy incidents that went AGAINST the document you linked as evidence to the insurrectionist activity of these "non-protests."
Wow! I'm sure it was accidental, but you actually managed to get something right there, you are no classical liberal! If you actually valued the things in which you pretend to be an expert, you'd understand the value in every individual's right to their own understanding, instead of spending years and a ridiculous amount of words in a tirade against everything you don't believe in that moment.
And, no, Van. Time goes on. I've been a professor most of the time you've "known" me.
shallowgallows said "...ive the same acts you denou..." Sad.
Hey, Van. You're still labeled as a "Classic American Liberal" on X. You might want to change that if the label is a bit too inclusive for you.
In before the "BuT i ExPlAiNeD mY lAbEl" complaints. I know you tried, but this reason doesn't make any sense: "I'm not a classical liberal because the development of the thought became too inclusive, and even though the whole point of classical liberalism is to respect individual rights of others (to private property, to their own beliefs and understanding of the world), I don't like being forced to respect opinions with which I don't agree, so I'm gonna add a word to the label and pretend it makes it totally different, even though I don't honor two of the three words in the label."
shallowAsstro said "...the thought became too inclusive..." Funny how a marxist ideologue thinks words don't matter, and has no problem bundling liberty & tyranny together as being 'inclusive'... but then I suppose that's how the 20th century became inclusively soaked with the blood of 100 million slaughtered lives.
Post a Comment